Volume 12, Issue 15 pp. 2806-2815
Article

Edge Plane Pyrolytic Graphite Electrode Covalently Modified with 2-Anthraquinonyl Groups: Theory and Experiment

Barbara R. Kozub

Barbara R. Kozub

Department of Chemistry, Physical & Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, United Kingdom, Fax: (+44) 1865-275-410

Search for more papers by this author
Martin C. Henstridge

Martin C. Henstridge

Department of Chemistry, Physical & Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, United Kingdom, Fax: (+44) 1865-275-410

Search for more papers by this author
Christopher Batchelor-McAuley

Christopher Batchelor-McAuley

Department of Chemistry, Physical & Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, United Kingdom, Fax: (+44) 1865-275-410

Search for more papers by this author
Prof. Dr. Richard G. Compton

Corresponding Author

Prof. Dr. Richard G. Compton

Department of Chemistry, Physical & Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, United Kingdom, Fax: (+44) 1865-275-410

Department of Chemistry, Physical & Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, United Kingdom, Fax: (+44) 1865-275-410Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 August 2011
Citations: 8

Graphical Abstract

Two models of surface inhomogeneity based on Marcus–Hush theory are investigated to explain the electrochemical behavior of an edge plane pyrolytic graphite electrode modified with 2-anthraquinonyl groups. Both a distribution of formal potentials, E′, and a distribution of electron tunneling distances, r0, are considered. The simulation of cyclic voltammograms involving the distribution of formal potentials (see picture) shows a better fit than the simulation with the distribution of tunneling distances.

Abstract

An edge plane pyrolitic graphite (EPPG) electrode was modified by electrochemical reduction of anthraquinone-2-diazonium tetrafluoroborate (AQ2-N2+BF4), giving an EPPG–AQ2-modified electrode of a surface coverage below a monolayer. Cyclic voltammograms simulated using Marcus–Hush theory for 2e process assuming a uniform surface gave unrealistically low values of reorganisation energies, λ, for both electron transfer steps. Subsequently, two models of surface inhomogeneity based on Marcus–Hush theory were investigated: a distribution of formal potentials, E′, and a distribution of electron tunneling distances, r0. The simulation of cyclic voltammograms involving the distribution of formal potentials showed a better fit than the simulation with the distribution of tunneling distances. Importantly the reorganization energies used for the simulation of E′ distribution were similar to the literature values for adsorbed species.