Volume 2019, Issue 7 p. 1461-1478
Full Paper

SN2 Reaction of Diarylmethyl Anions at Secondary Alkyl and Cycloalkyl Carbons

Riku Shinohara

Department of Bioengineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta‐cho 4259, Midori‐ku, Yokohama, 226‐8501 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Narihito Ogawa

Department of Bioengineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta‐cho 4259, Midori‐ku, Yokohama, 226‐8501 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hidehisa Kawashima

Department of Bioengineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta‐cho 4259, Midori‐ku, Yokohama, 226‐8501 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Kyohei Wada

Department of Bioengineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta‐cho 4259, Midori‐ku, Yokohama, 226‐8501 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Shun Saito

Department of Bioengineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta‐cho 4259, Midori‐ku, Yokohama, 226‐8501 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Takashi Yamazaki

Division of Applied Chemistry, Institute of Engineering, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-16 Nakamachi, Koganei, 184-8588 Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yuichi Kobayashi

Corresponding Author

Department of Bioengineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta‐cho 4259, Midori‐ku, Yokohama, 226‐8501 Japan

Department of Bioengineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta‐cho 4259, Midori‐ku, Yokohama 226‐8501, Japan

E‐mail: ykobayas@bio.titech.ac.jp

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 January 2019
Citations: 2

Abstract

The substitution reactions of diphenyl sec‐alkyl phosphates with Ar2CH anions were swift and proceeded with inversion. In contrast, the diphenyl substituted‐cyclohexyl phosphates proceeded with inversion, but showed different reactivity depending on the relative stereochemistry of the substituent and the (PhO)2PO2 leaving group. The difference in reactivity was rationalized by computational calculation of the transition energies.

Abstract

The substitution reaction of the diethyl allylic and propargylic phosphates with Ar2CH anions was applied to sec‐alkyl phosphates to compare reactivity and stereoselectivity. However, the substitution took place on the ethyl carbon of the diethyl phosphate group. We then found that the diphenyl phosphate leaving group ((PhO)2PO2) was suited for the substitution at the sec‐alkyl carbon. Enantioenriched diphenyl sec‐alkyl phosphates with different substituents (Me, Et, iPr) on the vicinal position underwent the substitution reaction with almost complete inversion (>99% enantiospecificity). The substitution reactions of cyclohexyl phosphates possessing cis or trans substituents (Me and/or tBu) at the C4, C3, and C2 positions of the cyclohexane ring were also studied to observe the difference in reactivity among the cis and trans isomers. A transition‐state model with the phosphate leaving group ((PhO)2PO2) in the axial position was proposed to explain the difference. This model was supported by computational calculation of the virtual substitution reaction of the structurally simpler “dimethyl” cyclohexyl phosphates (leaving group = (MeO)2PO2) with MeLi. Furthermore, the calculation unexpectedly indicated higher propensity of (PhO)2PO2 as a leaving reactivity than alkyl phosphate groups such as (MeO)2PO2 and (iPrO)2PO2.