Volume 6, Issue 18 p. 4495-4505
Full Paper

Antioxidant Efficacy of Natural Ubiquinol Compared to Synthetic References – In Vitro Study

Aneta Ácsová

Corresponding Author

Aneta Ácsová

Institute of Food Sciences and Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Radlinského 9, 812 37 Bratislava, Slovakia

Search for more papers by this author
Prof. Jarmila Hojerová

Prof. Jarmila Hojerová

Institute of Food Sciences and Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Radlinského 9, 812 37 Bratislava, Slovakia

Search for more papers by this author
Dr. Blanka Tobolková

Dr. Blanka Tobolková

Department of Chemistry and Food Analysis, National Agricultural and Food Centre – Food Research Institute, Priemyselna 4, P. O. Box 25, 824 75 Bratislava, Slovakia

Search for more papers by this author
Dr. Silvia Martiniaková

Dr. Silvia Martiniaková

Institute of Food Sciences and Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Radlinského 9, 812 37 Bratislava, Slovakia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 May 2021
Citations: 3

Graphical Abstract

CoQ10 is bioactive substance in two forms that play an important role in electron transport chain. In order to be effective antioxidant, ubiquinone must be reduced to ubiquinol. Antioxidant activity of naturally occurring Ubiquinol was studied. It has a slightly stronger antiradical activity than several synthetic antioxidants. Additionally, it has showed also strong ferric reducing power measured by in vitro spectrophotometric methods. According to the electron paramagnetic resonance’ measurements, α-tocopherol/ubiquinol mixture in specific concentration showed higher antioxidant activity as individuals.

Abstract

There are many studies dealing with the oxidized form (Ubiquinone) of coenzyme Q10, but only a little of its reduced form (Ubiquinol). Two yeast-based Ubiquinols (UQH2_S, Sigma-Aldrich; UQH2_K, Kaneka) were investigated for in vitro antioxidant efficacy compared to synthetic antioxidants. The antioxidant efficacy of UQH2_S and UQH2_K by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl’ (DPPH) assay as well as by the 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic) acid’ (ABTS) assay was almost identical (IC50DPPH/ABTS 0.387/0.226–0.219 mM, respectively). The values were higher (p<0.05) than that of α-tocopherol, Gallic acid, Butylhydroxyanisole, Butylhydroxytoluene. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power’ values for Ubiquinols (0.05–0.3 mM) were higher (p<0.05) than for the other antioxidants, except Gallic acid. According to the Electron paramagnetic resonance assay, the antioxidant activity of α-tocopherol/UQH2_S mixture was higher compared to the individual antioxidant only in specific combinations.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.